—
### **Acebeam E10 2.0 Performance Notes**
* **The High-CRI Trade-off:** Output dropped by ~25% on Turbo, though “High” remained competitive at 84% of original lumens.
* **Color Quality:** Massive upgrade from 68 Ra to 89-96 Ra across all modes.
* **Tint Behavior:** The High-CRI variant is more consistently neutral; it avoids the green shift of the standard Low mode but also doesn’t go rosy on Turbo.
* **Intensity:** Still manages over 100k candela with High-CRI, maintaining strong throw performance.
***
***
## 🔦 Weltool T1Pro V3: SFT25R 5000K High-CRI vs. (Standard)
—
### **Weltool T1Pro V3 Performance Notes**
* **Efficiency:** This host retained output very well, keeping 80% of its brightness after the swap.
* **CCT Shift:** The High-CRI emitter runs noticeably cooler (5300K vs 4900K on High) in this host.
* **CRI Upgrade:** Achieved a consistent 90+ Ra, providing significantly better color rendering than the stock emitter.
—
**Technical Testing Info:**
* **Distance:** All lux measurements taken at 5 Meters.
* **Sensor Conditions:** CCT/Duv/Ra measurements taken at **5,000 lux** for consistency.
* **Calculations:** Intensity = Lux @ 5m × 25 | Usable Range = SQRT(Candela)
1 Comment
## 🔦 Acebeam E10 2.0: SFT25R 5000K High-CRI vs. (Standard)
| Mode | Output: High-CRI (Std) | Intensity: High-CRI (Std) | Usable Range 1 lux: HCRI (Std) | CCT: High-CRI (Std) | Duv: High-CRI (Std) | Ra: High-CRI (Std) |
| :— | :— | :— | :— | :— | :— | :— |
| **Turbo** | **950 lm** (1,280) | **100,225 cd** (149,425) | **316m** (386m) | **4862K** (5009) | **+0.0030** (-0.0058) | **89** (68) |
| **High** | **350 lm** (416) | **41,050 cd** (51,000) | **202m** (226m) | **4859K** (4670) | **+0.0030** (+0.0012) | **92** (68) |
| **Medium** | **109 lm** (130) | **12,950 cd** (16,000) | **113m** (126m) | **4640K** (4648) | **+0.0025** (+0.0029) | **94** (68) |
| **Low** | **11 lm** (13) | **1,775 cd** (1,650) | **42m** (41m) | **5103K** (4624) | **+0.0018** (+0.0063) | **96** (68) |
—
### **Acebeam E10 2.0 Performance Notes**
* **The High-CRI Trade-off:** Output dropped by ~25% on Turbo, though “High” remained competitive at 84% of original lumens.
* **Color Quality:** Massive upgrade from 68 Ra to 89-96 Ra across all modes.
* **Tint Behavior:** The High-CRI variant is more consistently neutral; it avoids the green shift of the standard Low mode but also doesn’t go rosy on Turbo.
* **Intensity:** Still manages over 100k candela with High-CRI, maintaining strong throw performance.
***
***
## 🔦 Weltool T1Pro V3: SFT25R 5000K High-CRI vs. (Standard)
| Mode | Output: High-CRI (Std) | Intensity: High-CRI (Std) | Usable Range 1 lux: HCRI (Std) | CCT: High-CRI (Std) | Duv: High-CRI (Std) | Ra: High-CRI (Std) |
| :— | :— | :— | :— | :— | :— | :— |
| **High** | **640 lm** (800) | **14,725 cd** (19,025) | **121m** (138m) | **5324K** (4958) | **+0.0012** (-0.0016) | **90** (69) |
| **Medium** | **255 lm** (311) | **6,475 cd** (7,350) | **80m** (86m) | **5190K** (4761) | **+0.0025** (+0.0028) | **92** (68) |
| **Low** | **30 lm** (36) | **1,425 cd** (1,100) | **37m** (33m) | **4841K** (4645) | **+0.0021** (+0.0058) | **94** (69) |
—
### **Weltool T1Pro V3 Performance Notes**
* **Efficiency:** This host retained output very well, keeping 80% of its brightness after the swap.
* **CCT Shift:** The High-CRI emitter runs noticeably cooler (5300K vs 4900K on High) in this host.
* **CRI Upgrade:** Achieved a consistent 90+ Ra, providing significantly better color rendering than the stock emitter.
—
**Technical Testing Info:**
* **Distance:** All lux measurements taken at 5 Meters.
* **Sensor Conditions:** CCT/Duv/Ra measurements taken at **5,000 lux** for consistency.
* **Calculations:** Intensity = Lux @ 5m × 25 | Usable Range = SQRT(Candela)