I made a similar table and included a column for the tool to weight ratio. Never ended up weighing all my tools and finishing it though but it’s a fun experiment. Your table is awesome. Love the conditional formatting
Middle-Radio3675
Love my Bantam.
M1571K0
Nice table!
Tasty_Camel_2165
Pretty awesome you did this
KillMeAgainTwice
Why the absence of the swisstool x?
StickShift5
Really needs both thickness and width to get a feel for the envelope of the tool. That being said, this is a great chart!
Also, something is really wrong with the height measurement of the Free P4.
thedamnvtyankee
The infographic from multitools.org’s SAKWiki created by user NeleDo is handy chart 👍
PhyNxFyre
Needs some correction, from Leatherman’s website P2 and Signal are both 1.6cm thickness, but in inches it’s 0.65 for the P2 and 0.63 for the Signal. The Signal feels more comfortable in the pocket IMO, maybe due to its wider profile
NoMedium1223
Useful if accurate. Good job. I will look at this next time I get a multitool. If I can find it.
9 Comments
I made a similar table and included a column for the tool to weight ratio. Never ended up weighing all my tools and finishing it though but it’s a fun experiment. Your table is awesome. Love the conditional formatting
Love my Bantam.
Nice table!
Pretty awesome you did this
Why the absence of the swisstool x?
Really needs both thickness and width to get a feel for the envelope of the tool. That being said, this is a great chart!
Also, something is really wrong with the height measurement of the Free P4.
The infographic from multitools.org’s SAKWiki created by user NeleDo is handy chart 👍
Needs some correction, from Leatherman’s website P2 and Signal are both 1.6cm thickness, but in inches it’s 0.65 for the P2 and 0.63 for the Signal. The Signal feels more comfortable in the pocket IMO, maybe due to its wider profile
Useful if accurate. Good job. I will look at this next time I get a multitool. If I can find it.