*Opple LM4
*Lit Duo
*Hopoocolor HPCS-330P
*Sekonic C-800
All lights had to be set to a low-ish level, otherwise they would have blown out the poor Opple.
I used a tripod + claw to hold each light in a fixed position for comparable measurements.
Results are limited to the 3 most common ones on this sub: CCT (K), DUV and CRI (Ra). The Lit Duo does not currently support CRI, so it gets an n.a. once again (du-duun).
I selected another 12 lights. Sadly no high CCT high CRI lights since I (to my knowledge) do not have any. I know I know,
The first 12 lights are from my first post. I only corrected the LED of that X1S since it was indeed a 5009R.
The WK15 DUV measurements from the 330P were odd.
Also did the SK05s throw channel in turbo with a diffuser since that was asked for.
I do not know if the 330P or C800 is more accurate. Its probably a mix of both of them.
I provide the numberz, you do with them what you want 🙂
by Wormminator
1 Comment
Note that this is not meant to be a comparison between various lights, as they were not set to perfectly comparable brightness levels.
This is purely a insight into how these 4 spectrometers measure various lights, compared to each other.
And the conclusion so far is:
Opple LM4: Fine for the money
Lit Duo: NO. As “accurate” as the Opple, but at 15 times the price. Firmware is still in Beta and Lit is aware of these issues by now.
HPCS-330P: Great
C-800: Let me find my paypal@me link…